Microsoft For Mac Word Review Passive

  1. Microsoft For Mac Word Review Passive Voice
  2. Word For Mac

This tutorial shows you how to use the passive voice feature in Microsoft Word 2013. Please note that at the time of this recording, passive voice isn't available in Word 2016. I will update this. I think Microsoft Word, and WordPress, and other grammar editors, flag passive voice for the reasons you described. In certain contexts, it is appropriate. In others, it weakens the point of the sentence.

If you are using an earlier version of Word or work collaboratively, this is an essential revision. More Resources. Designed to give you the finest document-formatting tools, Word helps you organize and write your documents more efficiently. In addition, you can save documents online and access, edit, and share them from almost any Web browser. Your documents stay within reach so you can capture your best ideas whenever and wherever they occur.

The first word in title is capitalized. Example: 'Of Mice And Men' is a novel would be corrected to 'Of Mice and Men' is a novel. • Commonly Confused Words targets words that require special attention because they sound similar and may have related meanings. They often represent different parts of speech (word classes) and have different spellings.

Example: The goats ate the grass but the herder had nothing to eat. Would be corrected to ' The goats ate the grass, but the herder had nothing to eat'.

Microsoft For Mac Word Review Passive Voice

Select Spelling & Grammar. Change or ignore the results of your grammar check. Find mac address for my kindle fire. Review your passive sentence percentage in the Readability Statistics window. (This window won’t appear until you complete the grammar check.) 14. And now you know if your writing leans toward passivity or activity! Hello, Trease.

Word For Mac

Consider this extended exercise in passivity: When the cost of proposals is born by the business side of the house, frivolous proposals are stopped, proposals are better prioritized, and what is proposed is more likely to have a true ROI to the business, reducing waste and abandoned projects. The first passive-voice element ('is born') has an identified actor ('the business side of the house'), but the next three ('are stopped,' 'are prioritized,' and 'is proposed') do not. A reader slogging through this sentence must either struggle to identify the unnamed actors (the allocation of cost to the business side 'stops' frivolous proposals, the receivers of proposals [presumably managers] 'prioritize' them, and the makers of proposals [presumably lower-level staffers] 'propose' them) or—as is much more likely—skate over the surface of the sentence without really comprehending it. The following reformulation of the sentence is far likelier to make sense to a reader: Requiring the business side of the house to bear the cost of proposals discourages staffers from submitting frivolous proposals, encourages managers to give priority to the most promising suggestions, and increases the likelihood that proposals will offer a legitimate return on investment, thereby reducing waste and lowering the incidence of abandoned projects. The revised sentence is significantly longer than the original, but that's a price I'm willing to pay if it yields a sentence that identifies who is doing what, rather than leaving that task to each reader. Finally, actorless passive voice often crops up in situations where the unnamed actor responsible for the action in a sentence is in fact the author. In these instances, obscuring the author as the source of the action promotes a sense of the objective truth of the assertion.

This entry was posted on 13.01.2019.